Teaching and Educational Methods
Enhancing Student Engagement in a Changing Academic Environment-Tested Innovations for Traditional Classes and Online Teaching
Kristin Kiesel(a), Na Zuo(b), Zoë T. Plakias(c), Luis M. Peña-Lévano(d), Andrew Barkley(e), Katherine
Lacy(f), Erik Hanson(g), and Julianne Treme(h)
(a)University of California-Davis, (b)University of Arizona, (c)The Ohio State University, (d)University of Florida, (e)Kansas State University, (f)niversity of Nevada-Reno, (g)North Dakota State University, (h)North Carolina State University
JEL Codes: A22, A30
Keywords: Active learning, large classes, online tools, student engagement, teaching innovations, undergraduate teaching
Publish Date: June 24, 2020
Volume 2, Issue 3
Abstract
Agriculture is a global industry that constantly innovates and increasingly uses cutting-edge technology. A great number of job opportunities exist because this important sector of the economy is looking to recruit motivated and ambitious young people. Meanwhile, the academic environment is changing. Many programs experience increased class sizes and are introducing online curricula. Addressing these simultaneous challenges, eight teaching scholars from agricultural and applied economics programs presented their teaching approaches in a track session at the 2019 AAEA Annual Meeting. This article continues the conversation about specific teaching innovations tested in traditional classroom settings and online environments in an attempt to share lessons learned with a broader audience. Many of the insights presented here are easily adaptable when teaching remotely and will remain relevant once campuses reopen.
References
Allen, I. E., and J. Seaman. 2013. Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States: ERIC.
Allgood, S., W. B. Walstad, and J. J. Siegfried. 2015. “Research on Teaching Economics to Undergraduates.” Journal of Economic Literature 53(2):285–325.
Barrows, H. S., and R. N. Tamblyn. 1980. Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer.
Borokhovski, E., R. M. Bernard, R. M. Tamim, R. F. Schmid, and A. Sokolovskaya. 2016. “Technology-Supported Student Interaction in Post-Secondary Education: A Meta-Analysis of Designed versus Contextual Treatments.” Computers & Education 96:15–28.
Brouhle, K. 2011. “Exploring Strategic Behavior in an Oligopoly Market Using Classroom Clickers.” Journal of Economic Education, 42(4):395–404.
Burns, C., and S. Chopra. 2017. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Industry Engagement on Student Learning in Undergraduate Programs.” Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering 33(1):1–20.
Carini, R. M., G. D. Kuh, and S. P. Klein. 2006. “Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages.” Research in Higher Education 47(1):1–32.
Caviglia-Harris, J. L. and R. T. Melstrom. 2015. “Airing Your Dirty Laundry: A Quick Marketable Pollution Game for the Classroom.” Journal of Economic Education, 46(4):412–419.
Delemeester, G., and J. Brauer. 2010. “Games Economists Play: Noncomputerized Classroom Games.” The Journal of Economic Education 31(4):406. http://w3.marietta.edu/~delemeeg/games/.
Deming, D. J., C. Goldin, L. F. Katz, and N. Yuchtman. 2015. “Can Online Learning Bend the Higher Education Cost Curve?” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 105(5):496–501.
Edgerton, R. 2001. “Education White Paper.” http://www.pewundergradforum.org/wp1.html.
Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74(1):59–109.
Goodman, J., J. Melkers, and A. Pallais. 2019. “Can Online Delivery Increase Access to Education?” Journal of Labor Economics 37(1):1–34.
Helme, S., and D. Clarke. 2001. “Identifying Cognitive Engagement in the Mathematics Classroom.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 13(2):133–153.
Herrington, A., and J. Herrington. 2006. Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education. Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing.
Herrington, J., and R. Oliver. 2000. “An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 48(3):23–48.
Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith. 1991. “Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity.” ASHEERIC Report on Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED343465.pdf.
Jonassen, D. H., and L. Rohrer-Murphy. 1999. “Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Constructivist Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 47(1):61–79.
Kentnor, H. E. 2015. “Distance Education and the Evolution of Online Learning in the United States.” Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue 17(1):21–34.
Kuh, G., J. Kinzie, J. Buckley, B. Bridges, and J. Hayek. 2006. What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf.
Lei, H., Y. Cui, and W. Zhou. 2018. “Relationships between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Social Behavior and Personality 46(3):517–528.
McPherson, M. S., and L. S. Bacow. 2015. “Online Higher Education: Beyond the Hype Cycle.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(4):135–154.
National Center for Educational Conditions. 2019. The Condition of Education 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144.
Newmann, F. M. 1991. “Student Engagement in Academic Work: Expanding the Perspective on Secondary School Effectiveness.” In J. R. Bliss and W. A. Firestone, eds. Rethinking Effective Schools: Research and Practice. Reno NV: Better World Books.
Newmann, F. M., and G. Wehlage. 1993. “Five Standards of Authentic Instruction.” Educational Leadership 50(7):8–12.
Peña-Lévano, L. 2020. “Personalizing Online Classes: The Use of Evaluation and Participation Tools.” Applied Economics Teaching Resources 2(2).
Picault, J. 2019. “The Economics Instructor’s Toolbox.” International Review of Economics Education 30(100154):1–40.
Purdue University. 2015. “Employment Opportunities for College Graduates in Food, Agriculture, Renewable Natural Resources, and the Environment United States, 2015–2020.” https://www.purdue.edu/usda/employment/.
Quaye, S. J., and S. R. Harper, eds. 2015. Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical
Approaches for Diverse Populations, 2nd ed. New York: Routedge.
Schmid, R. F., R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, R. M. Tamim, P. C. Abrami, M. A. Surkes, C. A. Wade, and J. Woods. 2014. “The Effects of Technology Use in Postsecondary Education: A Meta-Analysis of Classroom Applications.” Computers & Education 72:271–91.
Trowler, V. 2010. Student Engagement Literature Review. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf.
Trowler, V., and P. Trowler. 2010. Student Engagement Evidence Summary. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/61680/1/Deliverable_2._Evidence_Summary._Nov_2010.pdf
Vilsack, T. 2016. “New Markets, New Opportunities: Strengthening Local Food Systems and Organic Agriculture.” https://medium.com/usda-results/new-markets-new-opportunities-strengthening-local-food-systems-and-organic-agriculture-17b529c5ea90.
Wang, M.-T., and R. Holcombe. 2010. “Adolescents’ Perceptions of School Environment, Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Middle School.” American Educational Research Journal 47(3):633–662.
Zepke, N., L. Leach, and P. Butler. 2014. “Student Engagement: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions.” Higher Education Research and Development 33(2):386–398.
Zuo, N., A. Josephson, and D. Scheitrum. 2019. “Engaging Students in Global Agriculture: Three Authentic-Learning Classroom Interventions.” NACTA Journal 63(1a):112–120.
Articles in this issue
How Do Students Allocate Their Time? An Application of Prospect Theory to Tradeâ€offs between Time Spent to Improve GPA Versus Time Spent on Other Activities
Brian K. Coffey, Andrew Barkley, Glynn T. Tonsor and Jesse B. Tack
Convenient Economics: The Incorporation and Implications of Convenience in Market Equilibrium Analysis
George Davis
Making Business Statistics Come Alive: Incorporating Field Trial Data from a Cookstove Study into the Classroom
Andrew M. Simons
Interacting with Agricultural Policy 280 Characters at a Time: Twitter in the Classroom
Julianne Treme
Gold in Them Tha-R Hills: A Review of R Packages for Exploratory Data Analysis
Kota Minegishi and Taro Mieno
Enhancing Student Engagement in a Changing Academic Environment-Tested Innovations for Traditional Classes and Online Teaching
Kristin Kiesel, Na Zuo, Zoë T. Plakias, Luis M. Peña-Lévano, Andrew Barkley, Katherine Lacy, Erik