Applied Economics Teaching Resources

an AAEA Journal

Agricultural and Applied Economics Association

Teaching Education Commentary

Moneyball in the Academy: Whiffing on the Quality of Education?

Paul N. Wilson
University of Arizona

JEL Codes: A20, A12
Keywords: Faculty evaluation, quality of education, responsibility-centered management, teaching

Publish Date: November 30, 2022
Volume 1, Issue 1

View Full Article (PDF)

Abstract

In recent years, corporate-like resource management tools have become commonplace on many university campuses with the goal of improving economic efficiency at the organizational level. Administrative initiatives that calculate faculty and department value with a limited number of metrics jeopardize the relational and hence the learning environment of higher education, particularly at the undergraduate level. Mutual faculty-student engagement remains a critical component of a quality education.

About the Author: Paul N. Wilson is a University Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona and Faculty Affiliate, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University. (Corresponding Author: paulwilson4872@gmail.com)

Copyright is governed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA

References

Deering, D., and C. Sá. 2018. “Do Corporate Management Tools Inevitably Corrupt the Soul of the University? Evidence from the Implementation of Responsibility Center Budgeting.” Tertiary Education and Management 24(2):115–127.

Dubeck, L.W. 1997. “Beware Higher Ed’s Newest Budget Twist.” The NEA Higher Education Journal (Spring):81–91.

Ginsberg, B. 2013. The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, M. 2003. Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. New York: W.W. Norton.

Vedder, R. 2019. Restoring the Promise: American Higher Education Today. Oakland CA: Independent Institute.