Teaching and Educational Methods

Assessing Student Learning Using a Digital Grading Platform

Andrew W. Stevens
Mississippi State University

JEL Codes: A20, A12
Keywords: Assessment, digital grading, student learning objectives

Publish Date: November 30, 2022
Volume 1, Issue 1

View Full Article (PDF)

Abstract

Effective assessment of student learning is challenging for several reasons. Not only do learning assessments usually crowd out instructional time, but it can be difficult to assess higher-order cognitive aspects of student learning. In this commentary, I present a method for assessing student learning through the use of a digital grading platform that addresses both of these issues. I discuss a case study where this method was implemented and utilized to inform course design, and I argue that digital grading platforms expand instructorsâ€™ options for student learning assessments.

Acknowledgements: This work would not have been possible without the collaboration and support of several anonymous administrators and instructors of the course studied in this article. I am greatly appreciative of their partnership. I have no commercial relationship with Gradescope, the digital grading platform discussed in this article, and my commentary should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any particular commercial product. This research has been determined exempt by the Mississippi State University Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research under protocol IRB-18-367. Any remaining errors are my own. About the Author: Andrew W. Stevens is an Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University. (Corresponding Author: a.stevens@msstate.edu)

References

Anderson, L.W., and D.R. Krathwohl, eds. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Anglin, L., K. Anglin, P.L. Schumann, and J.A. Kaliski. 2008. “Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Grading Through the Use of Computer-Assisted Grading Rubrics.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 6(1):51–73.

Atwood, S.A., and A. Singh. 2018. “Improved Pedagogy Enabled by Assessment Using Gradescope.” Paper presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City UT, 24–27 June. Paper ID #21186.

Banta, T.W., E.A. Jones, and K.E. Black. 2009. Designing Effective Assessment: Principles and Profiles of Good Practice. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, 4th. ed. New York: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill.

Birenbaum, M., K. Breuer, E. Cascallar, F. Dochy, Y. Dori, J. Ridgway, R. Wiesemes, and G. Nickmans. 2006. “A Learning Integrated Assessment System.” Educational Research Review 1:61–67.

Bloom, B.S., M.D. Engelhart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D.R. Krathwohl, eds. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.

Brown, S., J. Bull, and P. Race, eds. 1999. Computer-Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.

Bull, J. 1999. “Conclusion: A Glimpse of the Future.” In S. Brown, J. Bull, and P. Race, eds. Computer-Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 193–197.

Erickson, B.L., C.B. Peters, and D.W. Strommer. 2006. Teaching First-Year College Students. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Fink, L.D. 2013. Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Revised and Updated: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Fry, H., S. Ketteridge, and S. Marshall, eds. 2009. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, 3rd. ed. New York: Routledge.

Marzano, R.J. 2001. Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks CA: Corwin Press.

Seden, R. 1999. “Delivering Automated Innovative Assessment in a Varied Curriculum.” In S. Brown, J. Bull, and P. Race, eds. Computer-Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page, pp. 163–170.

Singh, A., S. Karayev, K. Gutowski, and P. Abbeel. 2017. “Gradescope: A Fast, Flexible, and Fair System for Scalable Assessment of Handwritten Work.” Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, pp. 81–88.

Suskie, L. 2018. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide, 3rd. ed. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wiggins, G., and J. McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design, 2nd. ed. Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.